"His vision of what Cincinnati should be most closely resembles what Cincinnati was."Canley is trying to emulate the Lukens (Charlie and Tom) in both the style he interacts with others, on all levels, and in what he sees as priorities for the City. It is like he is living in 1974 (the year he was born) and wants to attract the first Walmart to town and is hoping to build more roads to make it easier for suburbanites outside the city to get where they want to go and he's not seen the damage that type of development plan did to the City. I will state that again, DID to the City. That's not something to come, that is the past that happened because of people like Tom Luken, who John is emulating. Focusing on the suburban lifestyle (Strip Malls, Cul-de-Sacs, and cars) is the core of the past that killed Cities in post-WWII America and reached it's zenith in the 70's. This isn't a new idea for Cranley. He didn't just pick this up to get elected. He's been that way, and that is leaving his allies to be mostly Republicans, as they are the only ones still pushing the Suburbanist agenda forward.
It is such a shame that so much of the Progressive Vote (the Future!) stayed home on election day and left 'Past Cincinnati' to sweep in and give Cranley the chance to be another Luken and drive the City back 40 years.
When I think of Cranley I think of a "real square cat, he looks a-1974." Other than the Big Red Machine, he's reaching into a time when things here were not good. The City Government was squarely against the Urban Core. If John really wants to emulate the past, I suggest he not pick the 1970's subia and instead look to the example of something else.